Legal Opinion

Moore v. Barnheisel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court of Detroit. Bill of interpleader. Defendant Atkinson appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

This case comes up by appeal by the defendants Atkinson against a decree requiring the defendants to interplead. The objection to the decree calls for a short statement of facts and the explanation in defendants’ brief is very nearly all that is necessary. Charles A. McIntosh had insurance on the steamer Bertsehy for $5000. The steamer had been lost. Complainant’s law firm held for collection against McIntosh claims in favor of the Bay City Iron Company, the Brewster Coal Company, Bay City Dry Dock & Ship-yard Company and Lewis C. Iiansheer. Complainant was likewise empowered to act for Mrs.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sprague v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lanning v. StilesMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Gairing v. McClellandMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  3. People's Savings Bank v. LookMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API