Legal Opinion
Innis Arden Golf Club v. Pitney Bowes, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 21, 2009No. Civil No. 3:06cv1352 (JBA)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS FOR SANCTIONS FOR SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE
JANET BOND ARTERTON, District Judge.
In this case brought pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) and Connecticut state law, Plaintiff Innis Arden Golf Club (“Innis Arden”) seeks to recover the costs it incurred and is incurring in removing polychlorinated biphenyls (“PCBs”) from its property, along with other compensatory, injunctive, and equitable relief. Pit-ney Bowes, Inc. (“Pitney Bowes”), one of the two remaining defendants, has moved for this Court to impose sanctions on…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Fujitsu Limited v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Robert F. Byrnie v. Town of Cromwell, Board of Education, Body Corporate Cromwell Board of Education Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- West v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Eric Esher Schmid v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation Eric SchmidCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pension Committee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of America Securities, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Cedar Petrochemicals, Inc. v. Dongbu Hannong Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Cohn v. Guaranteed Rate, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
- Ferris Avenue Realty, LLC v. Huhtamaki, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2015
- Innis Arden Golf Club v. Pitney Bowes, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.