Briese Lichttechnik Vertriebs GmbH v. Langton
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
MICHAEL H. DOLINGER, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendants have moved in two phases for relief under Fed.R.Civ.P. 37. They contend that plaintiffs have failed to meet their discovery obligations in a number of respects, and as a result they seek an order compelling additional disclosures and an award of the expenses of their motions. In their initial motion, they assert that plaintiffs should be ordered to produce otherwise privileged documents listed on their privilege log concerning the patent prosecution, a demand that is *371based on a purported waiver of the privilege.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Paul A. BilzerianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Construction Products Research, Inc. Five Star Products, Inc. And H. Nash BabcockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Pritchard v. County of ErieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- In re Kidder Peabody Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nature's Plus Nordic A/S v. Natural Organics, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Baker v. Amazon Logistics, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2025