Legal Opinion

Steele v. Boley

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment upon demurrer to an answer in the district coart of the first district and from the order sustaining the demurrer. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, J.:

This is an action of ejectment, brought by Steele in the district court, for twenty acres of land. Tbe complaint is in tbe ordinary form in ejectment. To tbis complaint tbe defendants filed their answer, setting up a general denial, and pleading affirmatively: First, tbe statute of limitations, claiming adverse possession for seven years under a contract on tbe part of respondent to convey said land to defendants, of which they ask specific performance; second, that plaintiff is, in equity, estopped from claiming title to the land in controversy. To tbis answer plaintiff…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stark v. StarrsSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. Frisbie v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Carroll v. SaffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  4. Wirth v. BransonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Barney v. DolphSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Steele v. BoleyUtah Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Tyee Consolidated Mining Co. v. LangstedtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905
  3. Blumer v. Iowa Railroad Land Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. United States v. ElliotUtah Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Iowa Railroad Land Co. v. FehringSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API