Legal Opinion

State v. Harris

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 22, 1989No. 87-731PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARTER, Justice.

Defendant, Daniel Brian Harris, appeals from his conviction of first-degree murder in violation of Iowa Code sections 707.1 and 707.2 (1985). He makes three claims of error in arguing for reversal and a new trial. These are that the district court erred: (1) in overruling his motion for change of venue; (2) in overruling his motion to suppress evidence allegedly obtained as the product of a warrantless search; and (3) in overruling another motion to suppress evidence which, it is alleged, was obtained pursuant to an invalid search warrant. We consider each of these contentions…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Arizona v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  4. State v. SeagerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  5. State v. SpargoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. NeuendorfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  2. State v. SiemerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  3. State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
  4. State v. EscobedoCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1997
  5. State of Iowa v. Maurice D. Angel and Kemia B. McDowellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API