Legal Opinion
Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Applicants v. British American Commodity Options Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided August 8, 1977No. A-86 (77-96)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Marshall, Circuit Justice.
The Solicitor General, on behalf of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and its members, has applied to me as Circuit Justice to vacate stays of mandate entered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit pending applications for certiorari by the respondents herein. The stays have the consequence, for their limited duration, of preventing a Commission regulation that has yet to be enforced, Rule 32.6, 17 CFR § 32.6 (1977), from going into effect. The regulation, promulgated under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission Act of 1974…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Magnum Import Co. v. CotySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- HOLTZMAN Et Al. v. SCHLESINGER Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Jerome v. McCarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- British American Commodity Options Corp. v. BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- New York v. KleppeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
3Cited by15 opinions
- O’CONNOR, BY HER PARENTS AND NEXT FRIENDS, O’CONNOR Et Ux. v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF SCHOOL DISTRICT 23 Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Guidance Endodontics, LLC v. Dentsply International, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2008
- Scott Allen Hain v. Mike Mullin, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, Federal Public Defender for the Western District of Oklahoma, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Navajo Health Foundation-Sage Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. BurwellDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Offutt v. KaplanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.