Legal Opinion · Concurring in the judgment
Davis v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 3, 1986No. 66731Published
1Concurring in the judgmentOpala, Justice
The object of this original proceeding, brought here by a legislator whose standing to institute it is not challenged, is to invalidate “as null and void” by operation of Art. 5, § 26, Okl.Const.,1 all those acts of the Second Regular Session of the 40th Legislature which were passed by the House of Representatives after that session is claimed to have ended at the stroke of midnight on June 12, 1986. It is not disputed that on the day in question the House of Representatives convened at 9:30 a.m. and continued in session until 10:27 a.m. on June 13, the following calendar day, when the last…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kramer v. Union Free School District No. 15Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Cipriano v. City of HoumaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- City of Phoenix v. KolodziejskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Simpson v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.