Legal Opinion

Stamen v. Arrillaga

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 15, 2015No. 4D14-2652PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Sondra Stamen appeals a non-final order denying her motion to dismiss Appellee Justine Stamen Arrillaga’s complaint for lack of jurisdiction and improper venue. We hold that the trial court’s order sufficiently explained the rationale for finding jurisdiction and proper venue and we need not address those issues further. On appeal, Appellant additionally raises the doctrine of forum non conveniens and asserts “[t]he trial court intentionally failed to engage in [a forum non conve-niens] analysis.” As set forth below, Appellant’s forum non conveniens argument is “too little, too…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of TallahasseeSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Carenza v. Sun Intern. Hotels, Ltd.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. McDaniel Reserve Realty Holdings, LLC v. B.S.E. Consultants, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  4. Fox v. Union Carbide Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  5. Whitehead v. National Crane Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DEAN REIBER v. CAMILLA MAURITA YAMASAKIDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
  2. DEAN REIBER v. CAMILLA MAURITA YAMASAKIDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API