Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jamal Wright v. the State of Louisiana on Behalf of Jamie Alleyn, M.D., Ashley Van Wormer, M.D., Monique Sutherland, M.D., Megan Bina, D.O. and Ashely M Hirsch, M.D.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided August 5, 2020No. 2019-C-0499Published

1Dissent

JAMAL WRIGHT, ET AL * NO. 2019-C-0499 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL THE STATE OF LOUISIANA * FOURTH CIRCUIT ON BEHALF OF JAMIE ALLEYN, M.D., ASHLEY VAN * STATE OF LOUISIANA WORMER, M.D., MONIQUE SUTHERLAND, M.D., MEGAN * BINA, D.O. AND ASHELY M HIRSCH, M.D. * ******* TFL LOVE, J., DISSENTS AND ASSIGNS REASONS I respectfully dissent from the majority, as this matter is governed by jurisprudence that has yet to be countermanded. Rather than relying upon Velasquez and its progeny, I find that this case is governed by the principle reiterated in Gaffney v. Giles, 14-0384, p. 23 (La. App. 4 Cir.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carter v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  2. Ermert v. Hartford Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
  3. Sampay v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  4. Gettys v. WongLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Gaffney v. GilesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API