Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 29, 1979No. 28151Published

1DissentJustice Carrigan

I respectfully dissent.

The question is whether, in adopting reduced gas rates for two classes of low-income customers — the elderly and the disabled — the P.U.C. has established preferential and unjustly discriminatory rates forbidden by sections 40-3-102 and 40-3-106(1). In my view the P.U.C. has acted within its constitutional and statutory authority.

The majority opinion acknowledges that the determination of utility rates is a purely legislative function which has been delegated, in the first instance, to the P.U.C. by Article XXV of the Colorado Constitution. This Court has previously…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Pomeroy v. WaitkusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  4. Columbia Gas of New York, Inc. v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API