Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
1DissentJustice Carrigan
I respectfully dissent.
The question is whether, in adopting reduced gas rates for two classes of low-income customers — the elderly and the disabled — the P.U.C. has established preferential and unjustly discriminatory rates forbidden by sections 40-3-102 and 40-3-106(1). In my view the P.U.C. has acted within its constitutional and statutory authority.
The majority opinion acknowledges that the determination of utility rates is a purely legislative function which has been delegated, in the first instance, to the P.U.C. by Article XXV of the Colorado Constitution. This Court has previously…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Pomeroy v. WaitkusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Columbia Gas of New York, Inc. v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.