Faz v. State

OPINION

ONION, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of three offenses of robbery by assault (Cause Nos. 48,589, 48,590, 48,591) and of burglary with the intent to commit theft (Cause No. 48,592). Punishment in each case was assessed by the court at ten (10) years. The sentences were ordered to run concurrently. Appellant appeals each case on identical grounds of error.

The appellant waived a jury trial and entered a plea of guilty before the court to each of the four separate charges.

In three grounds of error appellant complains that the trial court erred in accepting his plea of guilty…