Haupt v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.
This is a suit under the Federal Employers ’ Liability Act, 45 U. S. C. A., Sec. 51 et seq., for personal injuries. At the close of plaintiff’s proof the trial judge sustained defendant’s motion for peremptory instructions and dismissed the action. Motion for a new trial was made and overruled. An appeal in the nature of a writ of error was prayed, granted and perfected. The case has been ably briefed and argued before us.
We speak of the parties as plaintiff and defendant. Plaintiff was an employee of defendant in its signal department, engaged in interstate commerce.
On the day of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Powell v. Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MihasSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Goodman v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
- Gaston v. SharpeTennessee Supreme Court · 1943
- Core v. ReshaTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kochins v. Linden-Alimak, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Kochins v. Linden-Alimak, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- McCoy v. Elm Hill MarinaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
- Provost v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1969
- Michael Shaw Burris, a Minor, B/n/f and Natural Guardian, Sarah Ann Burris and Sarah Ann Burris, Individually v. Nationwide Truck Brokers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985