Legal Opinion

United States v. Whiffen

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided November 29, 1927No. 3022Published

1Opinion of the Court

HICKENLOOPER, District Judge.

By motion to dismiss certain charges contained in the information in contempt and demurrer to this motion, treating the same as a special plea in bar, counsel have presently raised the question of the statute of limitations, if any, applicable to contempt proceedings, wMch they had contemplated raising under the plea of not guilty. This involves a consideration of sections 24 and 25 of the Clayton Act (Act Oct. 15, 1914, c. 323, 38 Stat. pp. 730, 739, *353740 [28 USCA §§ 389, 390; Comp. St. §§ 3.24 5d, 1245o]). This act is entitled “An act to supplement existing…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. United States v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1805
  3. Michaelson v. United States Ex Rel. Chicago, St. P., M. & OR Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. McCluny v. SillimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  5. Smythe v. FiskeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API