Legal Opinion

Zis v. Herman

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 1944No. 209PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

Plaintiffs below claimed that they entered into a written contract for the sale of real estate to defendants for $20,000; that by such contract defendants agreed to make a deposit of $1,000 as part payment, which deposit could be forfeited in the event of defendants’ default; that defendants gave a check for $1,000, representing said deposit, but thereafter stopped payment on the check and refused to comply with the contract. Plaintiffs asked damages of $1,000.

Defendants denied making the contract, alleging they had signed a written offer to purchase but had withdrawn…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. John Hetherington & Sons, Ltd. v. William Firth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Helvering v. American Dental Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Norris v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  4. Home Savings Bank v. SavranskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. Yellow Cab Co. of District of Columbia v. SuttonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Simpkins v. BrooksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Taylor v. United Broadcasting Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
  3. Eggleton v. VaughnDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. Lathon v. Hadley Memorial HospitalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Rosenbloom v. PosnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API