Lowdermilk v. Lowdermilk
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
I. DID THE TRIAL COURT ERR IN DENYING DIANE’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY SAMUEL’S ATTORNEY FOR CONFLICT OF INTEREST?
A. Facts
Diane was represented by Homer Burrell in a custody dispute with Philip Holman concerning their child Jamie. Diane and Samuel eventually became concerned about the quality of Burrell’s work. Samuel asked William Ford, his attorney in other matters including a domestic violence proceeding involving Diane, to look into the adequacy of Burrell’s representation of Diane in the custody dispute over Jamie. Ford says he told Samuel he did not want to get…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Merrill v. MerrillAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- Wanberg v. WanbergAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Carlson v. CarlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Merrill Ex Rel. Merrill v. FaltinAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
- Bussell v. BussellAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Schmitz v. SchmitzAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Evans v. EvansAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Lundquist v. LundquistAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Hopper v. HopperAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Taylor v. JohnstonAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.