Legal Opinion
Rodman v. Richfield Oil Co. of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 13, 1933No. 7106PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.
The Richfield Oil Company of California, a Delaware corporation, hereinafter referred to as “the company,” was at the date of the issuance of the bonds and the deed of trust hereinafter mentioned, and at the date of the commencement of the action in which the appellant sought to intervene, engaged in the production, refining, and marketing of petroleum and its products.
Prior to July 19,1929, the company duly authorized the creation of a bonded indebtedness of $75,000,000. On June 19, 1929, the company executed a trust indenture, hearing date of May 1, 3929, securing…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Credits Commutation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Olcott v. BynumSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Chicago & Vincennes Railroad v. FosdickSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Noonan v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
- Shaw v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State of Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Central West Public Service Co. v. CraigCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Carson v. Long-Bell Lumber CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
- Central States Life Ins. Co. v. Koplar Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- State v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.