Legal Opinion

In Re Bateman

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 1, 1928No. Docket No. 1701PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.

The petitioner seeks his liberty through a writ of habeas corpus. In a police court of the city of Bakersfield he was charged with unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and on June 27, 1928, he pleaded guilty to said charges and waived time for sentence. The allegations of the petition as to what was said and done by the police judge at that time being controverted by the return to this court, evidence was received in that behalf. Upon that issue we find that the judge orally rendered and pronounced judgment and sentence that the defendant pay a fine in the latter’s presence, but did…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte CrawfordCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. BlackmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. People v. KaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. McAllister v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. In Re PerryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API