Legal Opinion
District of Columbia v. Economides
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 26, 2009No. 08-CT-538PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRAMER, Associate Judge:
The issue in this appeal is whether a homeowner’s compliance with an amended building permit issued to him by the District of Columbia Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs (“DCRA”) bars the Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia (“OAG”) from prosecuting the homeowner for violations of the original permit that took place before the original permit was amended. Frank Eco-nomides argues that it does. The District argues that it does not. We agree with the District. Thus, for the reasons set forth herein, we reverse the trial court’s dismissal…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Samuel R. Pierce, Jr., Secretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- District of Columbia v. MorrisseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Price v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re TaylorDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Wynn v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Delaney v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Gause v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009