Cope v. Toronto
Utah Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs seek an extraordinary writ in the nature of mandamus to compel the Secretary of State, Lamont F. Toronto, to notify all county clerks in the state of Utah that the initiative petition, which he heretofore certified as proper to include on the general election ballot, should be removed therefrom and not submitted to the vote of the people on November 4, 1958.
The law sought to be voted upon under the provisions for initiative legislation, Chapter 11, Title 20, U.C.A.1953, relates to the legalizing of pari-mutuel betting on horse races. In March of this year the sponsors filed with…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Gallivan v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Boucher v. EngstromAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Renn v. Utah State Board of PardonsUtah Supreme Court · 1995
- Yute Air Alaska, Inc. v. McAlpineAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Municipality of Anchorage v. FrohneAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.