Legal Opinion

United States Casualty Co. v. Scott

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 9, 1935No. 24463PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

1. The director of the Department of Industrial Relations was authorized to make a finding (which was affirmed by the full board) that the injury received by the claimant was not compensable, in that said injury did not arise out of and during the course of his employment. This being so, neither this court nor the superior court should, upon what is termed the general grounds, reverse such finding. Maryland Casualty Co. v. England, 160 Ga. 810 (129 S. E. 75); Cooper v. Lumbermen’s Mutual Casualty Co., 179 Ga. 256, 262 (175 S. E. 577). The fact that the director of the Department of Industrial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. EnglandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  2. Cooper v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  3. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. FarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  4. Crittenden v. Southern Home Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Linder v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stenger v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  2. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co. v. HoneaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  3. MacOn News Printing Co. v. HamptonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  4. Bailey v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
  5. Elam v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API