Legal Opinion

Wurfel v. Bockler

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, C. J.

On December 30, 1919, Charles Bockler, one of the defendants here, as party of the first part, and J. J. Wurfel, plaintiff here, as party of the second part, made a written contract with each other whereby Bockler agreed to buy and Wurfel agreed to sell to Bockler certain real property described in the contract as lots 2, 3, 10 and 11 in Block 1 in the town of Barlow, Oregon. Further conditions of the agreement are as follows:

“The second party promises and agrees to furnish to the first party an abstract showing a merchantable title free from all encumbrances, which said title shall be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fagan v. HookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. People v. CampMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Peckham v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Lockhart v. FerreyOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Kane v. RippeyOregon Supreme Court · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ford v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Morley v. GiesekerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  3. Bockler v. WurfelOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Nowlin v. Columbia School DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  5. Cascade International Investment Co. v. KeeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API