Banuelos v. TSA Washington, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
¶1 The trial court summarily granted judgment to Raymond and Lisa Banuelos (buyers) against TSA Washington, Inc., d/b/a Hertz Car Sales (Hertz), under RCW 46.70.180(4)(a), Washington’s “bushing” law, for its Yakima dealer’s failure to return the buyers’ $1,000 down payment check and trade-in within three days. The court awarded $4.27 damages, $12.81 trebled damages under the Consumer Protection Act (CPA), chapter 19.86 RCW, and $90,125.00 for attorney fees. On appeal, Hertz contends the trial court erred (1) construing the bushing statute, (2) awarding damages, and (3) awarding excessive…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Bowers v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Berryman v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Buchanan v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Brian Fay v. Showcase MotorsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Fa Ala A Sailvi, V Parkland Auto Center Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014