Legal Opinion

Dahl v. Roach

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1930No. 4645PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFolland, J.

This case was argued at a former term of court and the judgment affirmed in an opinion written by Mr. Justice Gideon. Thereafter, upon petition, a rehearing was granted and the case was again argued before the court. We have reached the conclusion that the former decision should stand. We adopt the opinion written by Mr. Justice Gideon, with one or two slight changes, and have added some paragraphs at the end to dispose of matters raised by the motion for rehearing.

Plaintiff claims a right to travel over certain lands occupied by the defendant William R. Roach under contract of purchase from…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crosier v. BrownWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Vossen v. DautelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  3. Schulenbarger v. JohnstoneWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Tarpey v. VeithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  5. Watson v. County CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jensen v. GerrardUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Boyer v. ClarkUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Savage v. NielsenUtah Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API