Legal Opinion

Stillwell v. McGrath

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 26, 1964PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

85 N.J. Super. 252 (1964)

204 A.2d 385

GERALD STILLWELL, AN INFANT, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, SARAH E. STILLWELL, AND SARAH E. STILLWELL, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

MARGARET A. McGRATH, DEFENDANT AND THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF,

v.

THOMAS ANTOZZESKI, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.

Decided October 26, 1964.

Messrs. Kisselman, Devine, Deighan & Montano (Mr. Arthur Montano appearing), attorneys for Thomas Antozzeski, third-party defendant, for the motion.

Mr. George D. Rothermel, attorney for Margaret A. McGrath, defendant and third-party plaintiff, contra.

WOOD, A.C.,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Farren v. NJ Turnpike AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  2. Konitch v. HartungNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  3. Volek v. DealNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Elston v. Industrial Lift Truck Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. APPLE v. ReichertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Hut v. AntonioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  4. Linden v. SolomachaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  5. Brown, J. v. Gaydos, G., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API