Commonwealth v. Pugh

CONCURRING OPINION BY

OLSON, J.:

I agree with the learned majority that we must affirm Appellant’s judgment of sentence. However, I do not agree with the majority’s analysis with respect to Appellant’s second and third issues raised on appeal. Therefore, I write separately.

In his second issue on appeal, Appellant contends that the trial court erred by limiting his examination of Raziel Alverio (“Alverio”).1 Specifically, Appellant argues that, “Defense counsel wished to inquire at trial only on the issue of veracity with respect to [S.P.j’s representation at the medical center that she was a…