Ferguson v. Rochford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action to recover damages for waste, brought to and tried by the Superior Court in New Haven County, Williams, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff for $850, and appeal by the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtRoraback, J.
The appellant, in conformity with the rules of this court (Practice Book, 1908, p. 270, § 14), has made an application to rectify the appeal.
Paragraphs one, four, five and six of the application, which were admitted by the appellee, are allowed. Paragraph two of the application contains merely evidential facts which have no place in a finding, and for this reason this paragraph is denied. Paragraph three of the application was abandoned in argument. The facts set forth in the paragraphs allowed, so far as they have any bearing upon the questions presented by the appeal, have been considered…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Spencer's Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
- Connecticut Hospital for the Insane v. Town of BrookfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- Barber v. ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- Case v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Keeler v. EastmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1839
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Stout's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1935
- Zauner v. BrewerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Downey v. GuilfoileSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Davis Holding Corporation v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Anderson v. BradleyConnecticut Superior Court · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.