Legal Opinion

City of Fargo v. Komad

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 2006No. 20050452PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Eldin Komad appealed from a district court judgment of conviction for theft alleging his constitutional and statutory right to be present at trial was violated by the district court. Komad was charged with theft by the City of Fargo. Komad initially appeared and was tried and convicted in Fargo Municipal Court. Komad appealed his municipal court conviction to the district court. Komad was not present on his scheduled trial date in the district court. The district court conducted Ko-mad’s trial despite his absence. Komad was found guilty of the theft crime. We…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. City of Bismarck v. UhdenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Douville v. Pembina County Water Resource DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. City of Mandan v. BaerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Brenna v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. LougheadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. City of Fargo v. LevineNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. City of Williston v. WerkmeisterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Opp v. Office of the North Dakota Attorney General - BCI CWL UnitNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  5. City of Fargo v. WhiteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API