Legal Opinion

Gilman v. Zoning Board of Review

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 28, 1968PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

These petitioners for certiorari seek to quash a decision of the respondent board denying their application for a special exception or variance so as to permit the invasion of a business use into that portion of their land zoned residential.

In denying the application the board gave as its reason that petitioners failed to establish, as required by the ordinance, that the public convenience and welfare would be substantially served. The instant petition followed — petitioners contending that there is not a scintilla of legal evidence on which the board’s findings can rest.

However, it is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marks v. Zoning Bd. of Review of City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1964
  2. Churchill v. ZONING BD. OF CUMBERLANDSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1964
  3. Burke v. Zoning Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  4. Madden v. Zoning Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1959
  5. Day v. Zoning Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1961

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. May-Day Realty Corp. v. PAWT. APPEALS BD.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
  2. Rico Corp. v. Town of ExeterSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  3. Costa v. GagnonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  4. Gilman v. ZONING BD. OF REVIEW OF TOWN OF W. WARWICKSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  5. Farmer v. Carlson, 96-5489 (1997)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API