Legal Opinion
United States v. Stewart
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided June 21, 2004No. CRIM.A.04-65PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
LEMMON, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1) Defendant Brad Stewart’s Motion to Suppress Confession (Document 9) is DENIED.
2) Stewart’s Motion to Reveal Confidential Informant (Document 10) is DENIED.
3) Stewart’s Motion to Suppress Physical Evidence (Document 11) is DENIED.
A. Background.
In February 2004, a confidential informant told New Orleans Police Detective Alan Arcana that an individual had been distributing crack cocaine from a residence at 3048 North Rocheblave. The police obtained a search warrant for 3048 North Rocheblave, and executed it on March 4, 2004. Police…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Daniel Michael KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. BellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- The United States of America v. Clinton Ladon CooperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hyde v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007