Thomas v. Bartleson
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the Third Judicial District, in and for the County of Pinal. Edward Kent, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBaxter, J.
This action was instituted by S. M. Bartleson against appellant for partition of personal property. It was tried before the court with a jury. The verdict of the jury found the issues in favor of appellee, upon which judgment was entered decreeing a partition of the property in kind—one-half thereof to be assigned and allotted to the defendant, and one-half to the plaintiff. Erom this judgment the defendant appealed.
*514The appellant assigns several errors, as follows: (1) The admission of evidence over objection. (2) That the verdict and judgment are not supported by the evidence. (3) That the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Miami Copper Co. v. StrohlArizona Supreme Court · 1913
- Arizona Eastern Railroad v. Globe Hardware Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by4 opinions
- Arizona Land & Stock Co. v. MarkusArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Hays v. RichardsonArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Steinfeld v. NielsenArizona Supreme Court · 1913
- Steinfeld v. NielsenArizona Supreme Court · 1913