Legal Opinion

Bowler v. Vannoy

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1950No. 3598PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Horsey, C. J.:

In the above-entitled proceeding, the petitioners, Milton A. Bowler and Milton D. Bowler, by their attorneys, the Honorable Morley Griswold and the Honorable George L. Vargas, on the 8th day of December, 1949, presented informally to the justices of this court a petition for writ of mandate.

Such petition, together with the matters of fact and law alleged therein and the argument presented on behalf of said attorney George L. Vargas for petitioners disclosed sufficient cause to justify such an alternative writ to be issued in the premises.

Accordingly, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Babcock v. GoodrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. State ex rel. Sears v. WrightNevada Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Welter v. JacobsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Bohart v. AtkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1846
  5. Duncan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Miller v. BurkNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Dzack v. MarshallNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Bowler v. LeonardNevada Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Whitehead v. Nevada Com'n on Judicial DisciplineNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Bowler v. First Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API