Conklin v. Conklin
Supreme Court of Georgia
Equitable petition. Before Judge Hammond. Richmond superior court. January 14, 1918. On October 30, 1917, Mary L. Greer Conklin filed a petition in equity in Richmond superior court against George H. Conklin, Boykin Wright, Oswell R. Eve, Alonzo E. Purdy as administrator with the will annexed of Daniel B. Dyer, late of Richmond county, deceased, Turner C. Vason, and Dr. H. H. Malone, all of Richmond county, Georgia, the Dyer Investment Company, and the Augusta-Aiken Railway…
Read the full summary
Equitable petition. Before Judge Hammond. Richmond superior court. January 14, 1918. On October 30, 1917, Mary L. Greer Conklin filed a petition in equity in Richmond superior court against George H. Conklin, Boykin Wright, Oswell R. Eve, Alonzo E. Purdy as administrator with the will annexed of Daniel B. Dyer, late of Richmond county, deceased, Turner C. Vason, and Dr. H. H. Malone, all of Richmond county, Georgia, the Dyer Investment Company, and the Augusta-Aiken Railway & Electric Corporation, also of Richmond county, Georgia, and Dr. Henry D. Allen, of Baldwin county, Georgia. In…
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) In the view we take of this case it is unnecessary to consider and decide the several grounds raised by the special demurrers, and for that reaEson we have omitted from the statement of facts the allegations of the petition charging in detail the formation of the conspiracy, and the several acts of the various defendants in the execution of it, particularly those allegations against the defendant corporations, made for the purpose of showing their- connection with the conspiracy..
The constitution of this State provides: “Divorce cases shall be brought in…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Shiver v. the Valdosta PressCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Conklin v. Augusta Chronicle Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1921