Legal Opinion
Brannon v. Hills
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided July 18, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAvis, C J.
The appellant, Etta Brannon, applied to a representative of the complainant below, Metta V. Hills, for a loan of money with which to pay off a mortgage on the property against which the decree was rendered, that is now before us on this appeal. In consideration of the loan made, the defendant gave a mortgage .on. the property that at the time stood encumbered by an outstanding mortgage, for the purpose of discharging which, there is substantial evidence to show was the object of the new loan. The mortgage given to secure the new loan was apparently valid at the time. Subsequent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boley v. DanielSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
- Hewitt Hewitt v. Punta Gorda State BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Fed. Land Bk. of Columbia v. GodwinSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. DekleSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
3Cited by5 opinions
- Town of River Junction v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
- Anderson v. Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. (In re Judd)District Court, D. South Carolina · 2012
- Velazquez v. SerranoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Risk v. Barnett Bank of St. Petersburg, N. A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Sherman v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012