Legal Opinion
Bartlett v. Bell
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 29, 1922No. Civ. No. 4082PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREWETT, J., pro tem.
The city of Berkeley is a municipal corporation organized under a freeholders’ charter. During all the period of time involved in this proceeding the appellant was the mayor and the respondent was the auditor of said city.
The council of said city on the fifteenth day of March, 1921, adopted an ordinance amending a former ordinance establishing a municipal market in said city. Said ordinance and the amendment thereto provide for the selection of a market manager. Section 4 of said amended ordinance reads as follows:
“Section 4. That the market manager shall make the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Fleming v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
- Russell v. AyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Russell v. . AyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- City of San Buenaventura v. McGuireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- City of San Diego v. CappsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
3Cited by2 opinions
- City of Roseville v. TulleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Austin v. UpjohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933