State v. New Times, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
DONOFRIO, Presiding Judge.
Appellant New Times, Inc. was charged with having violated A.R.S. § 13-213, which makes it a misdemeanor to willfully write, compose or publish a notice of advertisement of any medicine or means for producing or facilitating a miscarriage or abortion. A.R.S. § 13-213, together with A.R.S. §§ 13-211 and 13-212, comprise Arizona’s so-called abortion statutes, which were enacted at the same time, and have been consolidated, presented and revised as a unitary scheme since at least 1928. See, Chap. 104, §§ 4645-4646, Ariz.Rev.Code 1928, and Chap. 43, Art. 3, §§ 43-301 to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Doe v. BoltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hancock v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1927
- Planned Parenthood Committee of Phoenix, Inc. v. Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Nelson v. Planned Parenthood Center of Tucson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Vo v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- State v. RenteriaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- State v. SulmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. BrahyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- State v. BrahyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.