Legal Opinion

Rivera v. Harris

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 6, 1989No. 46541PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

This case began when the appellant, Steven Rivera, filed a pro se complaint for mandamus as an indigent. The trial court, relying on OCGA § 9-15-2 (d), refused to allow the complaint to be filed. Rivera then filed a notice of appeal, after which the clerk of superior court transmitted the record to this court. However, the clerk failed to include in the record a copy of the disallowed petition and other pertinent documents, which apparently have been lost or discarded. In an attempt to remedy these omissions, Rivera attached to his brief an appendix containing what he asserts…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  2. High v. ZantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  3. Vaughan v. BuiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  4. Taylor v. BentleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  2. Brown v. Fokes Properties 2002, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2008
  3. Chernowski v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  4. Union v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  5. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API