Frost v. Bankers Commercial Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
It is unnecessary to pass on the sufficiency of the amended complaint for, even assuming it to state a cause of action, the defendant is entitled to summary judgment dismissing the action. The judgment of the Supreme Court, affirmed by the Appellate Division, in the first action brought by the Republic Chemical Corporation v. Bankers Commercial Corp., 73 N.Y.S.2d 318, affirmed 269 App.Div. 736, 54 N.Y.S.2d 396, determined the claim here in suit adversely to the plaintiff’s contentions. The bills of lading, out of which the claim asserted in this action arises, were…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Person v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
3Cited by11 opinions
- Goldstein v. DoftDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Aries Realty, Inc. v. AGS Columbia AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Schoenbaum v. FirstbrookDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Kane v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Katz v. State of ConnecticutDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.