Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Chadwick Timber Co. v. Philon

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 19, 2008No. 1061210Published

1ConcurrenceMurdock, Justice

The Court in this case denies the petition for the writ of certiorari, but in so doing explains that it “does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion.” 10 So.3d at 1024. I concur in the order denying the petition. The purpose of this separate writing is to explain my reasons for “not wishing] to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion.”

I. Background Facts and, Procedural History

Charles Philon sued his employer, Chadwick Timber Company…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Ex Parte Trinity Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  3. Smith v. Equifax Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Liberty Nat. v. Univ. of Ala. Health Servs.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  5. Tucker v. NicholsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API