Legal Opinion

Oklahoma City v. Arnold

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 12, 1933No. 23869PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was filed within the statutory 30' days by the city of Oklahoma City, a municipal corporation, in which they complain of an award made and entered by the Industrial Commission on the 18th day of June, 1932, in which the claimant, C. P. Arnold, was granted compensation at the rate of $11.73 per week, computed from May 28, 1931, to June 3, 1932, less any sum or sums theretofore paid as compensation, the payment to continue for a total of 500 weeks, as compensation for the total permanent disability suffered by the claimant by reason of industrial blindness in both eyes, and there…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McAlester Colliery Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Drumbight Feed Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Ryan v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Skelly Oil Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Southern Surety Co. v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Skelly Oil Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. J. J. Harrison Construction Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Producers & Refiners Corp. v. McDougalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Acme Semi-Anthracite Coal Co. v. ManningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API