Zeno v. Flowers Baking Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GENOVESE, Judge.
|Jn this workers’ compensation case, Willie J. Zeno, Sr., in proper person, appeals the judgment sustaining the peremptory exceptions of prescription and res ju-dicata filed by Defendant, Flowers Baking Company (Flowers). Flowers answered *304the appeal, seeking an increase in the $500.00 award of sanctions against Mr. Zeno. For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the Office of Workers’ Compensation sustaining the peremptory-exceptions, and we deny Flowers’ request for an increase in sanctions.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Mr. Zeno filed a disputed claim for workers’…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Capo v. BlanchardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
- Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- Amoco Production Co. v. Texaco, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- Stevens v. BruceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
- Huddleston v. FARMERS-MERCH. BANK & TRUSTLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brielle's Florist & Gifts, Inc. v. Trans Tech, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- Mendonca v. Tidewater, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- Davis v. State, Department of Transportation & DevelopmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- Zeno v. AlexLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Brielles Florist & Gifts, Inc. v. Trans Teche, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.