Legal Opinion

Institute of Holy Angels v. Bender

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 8, 1909PublishedCited by 9 opinions

On certiorari.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Swayze, J.

The prosecutor claims exemption from taxation on its real estate upon the ground that it is a school not *35conducted for profit within section 3, placitum 4, of the Tax act of 1903. Pamph. L., p. 395. Three tracts of land are involved — first, the main tract of something more than seven acres, on which were located all the buildings of the prosecutor at the time of the assessment now in question on May 20th, 1908; second, the LaTours tract upon which a new building was erected shortly afterwards; third, the Linwood avenue tract of four acres.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Such v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
  2. Trustees of Stevens Institute of Technology v. BowesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1906

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Trenton v. NJ Div. of Tax AppealsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  2. Institute of Holy Angels v. Borough of Fort LeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
  3. City of New Brunswick v. George Street Playhouse, Inc.New Jersey Tax Court · 1981
  4. Pingry Corp. v. Hillside Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  5. Buxton Country Day School, Inc. v. Township of MillburnNew Jersey Tax Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API