Nance v. State

DONALD L. CORBIN, Associate Justice.

|, This appeal stems from Appellant Sandra Nance’s conviction and sentence on multiple counts of animal cruelty, as well as entry of a supplemental order determining the costs of care and custody of dogs seized from Nance’s property. Nance argues the following points on appeal: (1) the circuit court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence gathered from a search of her property; (2) Arkansas Code Annotated section 5-62-106 (Supp.2011), governing the seizure of animals, violates the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and article…