Legal Opinion

In re Gillam

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 3, 1930No. 2212PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

Wallace R. Gillam, the appellant, filed his application, serial No. 5868, on January 30, 1925, for a patent on an improvement in rim adapters. Eight claims in all were filed, of which claim No. 7 was allowed and the balance rejected by both the examiner and the Board of Appeals.

Claim 1, which is typical of all the claims, is as follows:

1. In a means for the conversion of a pneumatic-tired wheel of standard make having a fixed rim formed of an annular band and side walls having rim seats at their edges formed to receive a pneumatic-tire with its demountable rim, into a cushion-tired wheel; the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hanifen v. ArmitageU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1902
  2. Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Fur Refining Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re WatsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  2. Tulchin v. Perey Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API