Legal Opinion

Stickney v. Kerry

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1960No. 35035PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

While there are two plaintiffs and four defendants named in the title to this action, C. L. Stickney is the only plaintiff and Ruth B. Kerry the only defendant involved in this appeal.

The question in the case is: In a partnership accounting, can a nonpartnership debt owed by a bankrupt partner to one of the other partners be paid to him out of the bankrupt partner’s interest?

The partnership involved in this litigation was composed of four members, one of whom, Stickney, leased the partnership property, known as the West Tenino Lumber Company, and employed another partner, Harold E. Kerry, to…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Amsinck v. BeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Cook v. VennigerholzWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Pendleton v. BeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Gibbons v. Dexter Horton Trust & Savings BankDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1915
  5. Cruchet v. Red Rover Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re: Norman W. Shearin, Jr. Ann Shearin, Debtors. Stephen L. Beaman, Trustee v. Norman W. Shearin, Jr. Ann ShearinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  2. Cutler v. Cutler (In Re Cutler)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1994
  3. Beaman v. ShearinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API