Legal Opinion

Guy v. SCHULDT

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1956No. 29,364Published

1Opinion of the Court

236 Ind. 101 (1956)

138 N.E.2d 891

GUY

v.

SCHULDT ET AL.

No. 29,364.

Supreme Court of Indiana.

Filed December 20, 1956.

Maxwell P. Smith, Richard D. Logan and Miller, Nieter & Smith, of counsel, of Fort Wayne, for appellant.

Barrett, Barrett & McNagny, of Fort Wayne, and Bowser & Bowser, of Warsaw, for appellees.

ARTERBURN, J.

The appellant brought this action against the appellees to recover damages for medical malpractice. The issue arises upon a demurrer filed by the appellees on the ground that appellant's claim was barred by the two year statute of limitations for malpractice. Acts 1941, ch. 116, §…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Guy v. SCHULDTIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Kincheloe v. FarmerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  3. Schmit v. EsserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Potter v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Hotelling v. WaltherOregon Supreme Court · 1942

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API