Legal Opinion

Riverbank Realty Co. v. Koffman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 23, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The moving defendants are not parties to the exclusive *543brokerage agreement between plaintiff and defendant P.A. Realty Corporation, and thus plaintiff’s causes of action against them for breach of contract and quantum meruit were properly dismissed. The fraud claims were also properly dismissed, it being well settled that where the alleged fraud relates to a cause of action for breach of contract, the fraud cannot be the basis for a separate cause of action (Giannisis v Maniatis, 160 AD2d 629, lv dismissed 76 NY2d 888). However, it was error to sustain the seventh cause of action for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Satin v. SatinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Giannisis v. ManiatisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kestenbaum v. SuroffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Atlas MF Mezzanine Borrower, LLC v. Macquarie Tex. Loan Holder LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API