Legal Opinion

United States v. Jerome Strauss and Adam Strauss

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 29, 1993No. 1461, 1462, Dockets 92-1764, 92-1765PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MINER, Circuit Judge:

Defendants-appellants Jerome Strauss (“Jerome”) and Adam Strauss (“Adam”) appeal from judgments of conviction entered on December 14, 1992 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Mishler, /.). The Strausses were convicted, following a jury trial, on one count of conspiring to hold for sale misbranded and adulterated dog food, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 343(a)(1) and 342(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 371 and on twelve counts of causing false labels to be affixed to dog food with the intent to defraud and mislead, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Maynard v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. Ralph Kelly Taylor, IICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. Dell v. StraubDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
  2. Bossett v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  3. Bossett v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. GlennCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Vassilios K. HandakasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API