Legal Opinion
Finck v. Bliss
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 3, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHamm, J.
The petitioners are all suspended members of the police department of the City of Hudson. On September 30, 1952, they were charged with improper conduct and neglect of duty and more particularly with committing specific acts of misconduct alleged in indictments charging them with perjury. On the same day they were suspended from duty without pay.
On January 16, 1953, the respondent police commissioner of the City of Hudson issued the following directive:
“ 1. Any of the members of this Department subject to the action of Directives Numbers 51 and 52 (both dated September 30, 1952) who, after…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Duncan Townsite Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Evans v. MonaghanNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Matter of Durr v. Paragon Trading Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Matter of Coombs v. EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Matter of Pruzan v. ValentineNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hampton Heights Development Corp. v. Board of Water SupplyNew York Supreme Court · 1987
- Bentley v. HenningerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Schmidt v. MacedonioNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- Halls v. Van BurenNew York Supreme Court · 1965