People v. Montecito Water Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple C.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered upon demurrer to complaint.
The demurrer was general, and on the ground of insufficiency of the facts. It is a proceeding taken by the attorney-general of the state in the nature of a quo warranto to deprive the defendant corporation of its corporate charter, and procure its dissolution on two grounds: 1. For want of a substantial compliance with the statutory requirements in its formation; and 2. For abandon*277ment and misuse of its corporate franchise and powers, and for alleged violations of law.
In answer to the first point, the respondent…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. La RueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- People v. GunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Larrabee v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- People ex rel. Attorney-General v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- First Baptist Church v. BranhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Phillips v. Brazosport Savings & Loan AssociationTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- People v. Linda Vista Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Randle v. Winona Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Enos v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- Marshall-Wells Co. v. KramlichIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.