Legal Opinion

Wanglie v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 30, 1986No. C0-86-1453PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

David Wanglie appeals from an order denying post-conviction relief. He was convicted for misdemeanor assault in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.224, subd. 1 (1986) and reckless driving in violation of Minn. Stat. § 169.13, subd. 1 (1986) following a jury trial. He contends the trial court erred in (1) denying his request for a continuance, claiming he did not receive a Rasmussen notice, and (2) admitting evidence in violation of Spreigl notice requirements. We affirm.

FACTS

At approximately 11:00 p.m. on June 21, 1984, Stanley Zahorsky, complainant, and Karen Mjolhus,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. State v. LoebachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. BoyceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. State v. BlackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. State v. DoughmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API