Wanglie v. State
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
David Wanglie appeals from an order denying post-conviction relief. He was convicted for misdemeanor assault in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.224, subd. 1 (1986) and reckless driving in violation of Minn. Stat. § 169.13, subd. 1 (1986) following a jury trial. He contends the trial court erred in (1) denying his request for a continuance, claiming he did not receive a Rasmussen notice, and (2) admitting evidence in violation of Spreigl notice requirements. We affirm.
FACTS
At approximately 11:00 p.m. on June 21, 1984, Stanley Zahorsky, complainant, and Karen Mjolhus,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State v. LoebachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. BoyceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- State v. BlackSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. DoughmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992